RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients may receive hypomethylating agents (HMAs) such as decitabine (DAC) as part of their treatment. Not all patients respond to this therapy, and if they do the clinical response may occur only after 3 to 6 courses of treatment. Hence, early biomarkers predicting response would be very useful. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 22 AML patients who were treated with DAC. Histology of the bone marrow biopsy, pathogenic mutations and methylation status were related to the treatment response. RESULTS: In 8/22 (36%) patients, an erythroid dominant response (EDR) pattern, defined as a ratio of myeloid cells/erythroid cells < 1, was observed. In the remaining 14 cases a myeloid predominance was preserved during treatment. No difference in the hypomethylating effect of DAC treatment was observed in patients with and without EDR, as global 5-methylcytosine levels dropped similarly in both groups. Mutational analysis by NGS using a panel of commonly mutated genes in AML, showed that patients with an early EDR harbored on average less mutations, with U2AF1 mutations occurring more frequently, whereas RUNX1 mutations were underrepresented compared to non-EDR cases. Interestingly, the development of an EDR correlated with complete remission (7/8 cases with an EDR versus only 2/14 cases without an EDR). CONCLUSION: We conclude that early histological bone marrow examination for the development of an EDR may be helpful to predict response in AML patients during treatment with DAC.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Is it possible to eliminate metastasised chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) and acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) cells from ovarian cortex fragments by inhibition of Aurora B/C kinases (AURKB/C) without compromising ovarian tissue or follicles? METHODS: Human ovarian cortex tissue with experimentally induced tumour foci of CML, AML and primary cells of AML patients were exposed to a 24h treatment with 1 µM GSK1070916, an AURKB/C inhibitor, to eliminate malignant cells by invoking mitotic catastrophe. After treatment, the inhibitor was removed, followed by an additional culture period of 6 days to allow any remaining tumour cells to form new foci. Ovarian tissue integrity after treatment was analysed by four different assays. Appropriate controls were included in all experiments. RESULTS: Foci of metastasised CML and AML cells in ovarian cortex tissue were severely affected by a 24h ex vivo treatment with an AURKB/C inhibitor, leading to the formation of multi-nuclear syncytia and large-scale apoptosis. Ovarian tissue morphology and viability was not compromised by the treatment, as no significant difference was observed regarding the percentage of morphologically normal follicles, follicular viability, glucose uptake or in vitro growth of small follicles between ovarian cortex treated with 1 µM GSK1070916 and the control. CONCLUSION: Purging of CML/AML metastases in ovarian cortex is possible by targeting the Mitotic Catastrophe Signalling Pathway using GSK1070916 without affecting the ovarian tissue. This provides a therapeutic strategy to prevent reintroduction of leukaemia and enhances safety of autotransplantation in leukaemia patients currently considered at high risk for ovarian involvement.
